Vol. 34 No. 2 (2025): NJAS Special Issue: Negotiating Consent in African Studies
Special issue: Negotiating Consent in African Studies

Authentic Consent and the Decolonial Trouble of “Studying Up”

PDF
Karmen Tornius
Freie Universität Berlin
Bio

Published 2025-06-23

Keywords

  • gender politics,
  • elite research,
  • decolonial methodologies,
  • consent

Copyright (c) 2025 Karmen Tornius

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Authentic Consent and the Decolonial Trouble of “Studying Up”. (2025). Nordic Journal of African Studies, 34(2), 122–141. https://doi.org/10.53228/hnpwmb50

Abstract

Studying gender in African Union and national politics, I came across a scenario in which my interview requests were ignored until someone from the donor community vouched for me. As field-based researchers, we often rely on our networks to facilitate access to interlocutors. How should we interpret situations where the relationship between the facilitator and the desired interlocutor is characterised by a degree of dependency and asymmetrical power relations? In this article, I build on autoethnographic vignettes of moments when consent was refused; when consent was given upon international donors’ intervention; when consent was given upon intervention by a “gender and development” community member; and finally, when consent was given upon intervention by national staff of a development partner. Theoretically, I grapple with how decolonial approaches to “studying up” may inform the notion of “authentic consent”, interrogating race and nationality, professional communities, and gender in knowledge production. By examining the implications of skewed North–South power relations for negotiating consent, the article examines the challenges of implementing decolonial research strategies when “studying up” in Ethiopia and Kenya. Drawing on my fieldwork experiences and the scholarship outlined above, I argue that authentic consent is both relational and steeped in complex and context-specific power relations. 

PDF

References

  1. Adler, Emanuel. 2008. “The Spread of Security Communities: Communities of Practice, Self-Restraint, and NATO’s Post-Cold War Transformation.” European Journal of International Relations 14 (2), 195–230.
  2. Adler, Emanuel, and Vincent Pouliot. 2011. “International Practices”. International Theory 3 (1): 1–36.
  3. Adler-Nissen, Rebecca. 2015. “Relationalism or Why Diplomats Find International Relations Theory Strange.” In Diplomacy and the Making of World Politics, edited by Ole Jacob Sending, Vincent Pouliot, and Iver B. Neumann, 284-308, Cambridge Studies in International Relations, Cambridge University Press.
  4. Appiah, Richard. 2021. “Gurus and Griots: Revisiting the Research Informed Consent Process in Rural African Contexts.” BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1): 98.
  5. Benton, Adia. 2016. “African Expatriates and Race in the Anthropology of Humanitarianism”. Critical African Studies 8 (3): 266–277.
  6. Bilgin, Pinar. 2008. “Thinking Past ‘Western’IR?” Third World Quarterly 29 (1): 5–23.
  7. Blaney, David L., and Arlene B. Tickner. 2017. “Worlding, Ontological Politics and the Possibility of a Decolonial IR.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 45 (3): 293–311.
  8. Bochner, Arthur, and Carolyn Ellis. 2016. Evocative Autoethnography: Writing Lives and Telling Stories. Routledge.
  9. Bouka, Yolande. 2015. “Researching Violence in Africa as a Black Woman: Notes from Rwanda.” Conflict Field Research. https://conflictfieldresearch.colgate.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Bouka_WorkingPaper-May2015.pdf.
  10. Campbell, Lisa M., Noella J. Gray, Zoe A. Meletis, James G. Abbott, and Jennifer J. Silver. 2006. “Gatekeepers and Keymasters: Dynamic Relationships of Access in Geographical Fieldwork.” The Geographical Review 96 (1): 97–122.
  11. Capan, Zeynep Gulsah. 2020. “Beyond Visible Entanglements: Connected Histories of the International.” International Studies Review 22 (2): 289–306.
  12. Chowdhry, Geeta, and Sheila Nair. 2005. Power, Postcolonialism and International Relations: Reading Race, Gender and Class. Routledge.
  13. Clark, Tom. 2011. “Gaining and Maintaining Access: Exploring the Mechanisms That Support and Challenge the Relationship between Gatekeepers and Researchers.” Qualitative Social Work: Research and Practice 10 (4): 485–502.
  14. Clifford, James, and George E. Marcus. 1986. Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. University of California Press.
  15. Cohen, Nissim, and Tamar Arieli. 2011. “Field Research in Conflict Environments: Methodological Challenges and Snowball Sampling”. Journal of Peace Research 48 (4): 423–435.
  16. Duke, Karen. 2002. “Getting beyond the ‘Official Line’: Reflections on Dilemmas of Access, Knowledge and Power in Researching Policy Networks.” Journal of Social Policy 31 (1): 39–59.
  17. Dunia, Oscar Abedi, Maria Eriksson Baaz, David Mwambari, Swati Parashar, Anju Oseema Maria Toppo, and James B.M. Vincent. 2020. “The Covid-19 Opportunity: Creating More Ethical and Sustainable Research Practices.” Items: Insights from the Social Sciences. https://items.ssrc.org/covid-19-and-the-social-sciences/social-research-and-insecurity/the-covid-19-opportunity-creating-more-ethical-and-sustainable-research-practices/
  18. Ellis, Carolyn, Tony E. Adams, and Arthur P. Bochner. 2011. “Autoethnography: An Overview.” Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung 36 (4): 273–290.
  19. Eyben, Rosalind. 2011. “The Sociality of International Aid and Policy Convergence.” In Adventures in Aidland: The Anthropology of Professionals in International Development, edited by David Mosse, 139–160. Berghahn Books.
  20. Falola, Toyin. 2022. Decolonizing African Studies: Knowledge Producting, Agency and Voice. University of Rochester Press.
  21. Fonseca, Melody. 2019. “Global IR and Western Dominance: Moving Forward or Eurocentric Entrapment?” Millennium 48 (1): 45–59.
  22. Friedman, Jonathan. 1997. “Global Crises, the Struggle for Cultural Identity and Intellectual Porkbarrelling: Cosmopolitans vs. Locals, Ethnics and Nationals in an Era of Dehomogenisation.” In Debating Cultural Hybridity: Multi-Cultural Identities and the Politics of Anti-Racism, edited by Pnina Werbner and Tariq Modood , 70- 89. Zed Books.
  23. Friedman, Jonathan. 2002. “Champagne Liberals and the New ‘Dangerous Classes’: Reconfigurations of Class, Identity, and Cultural Production in the Contemporary Global System.” Social Analysis: The International Journal of Social and Cultural Practice 46 (2): 33–55.
  24. Frimpong-Mansoh, Augustine. 2008. “Culture and Voluntary Informed Consent in African Health Care Systems.” Developing World Bioethics 8 (2): 104–114.
  25. Gelardi, Maiken. 2020. “Moving Global IR Forward – A Road Map.” International Studies Review 22 (4): 830–852.
  26. Haraway, Donna. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14 (3): 575–599.
  27. Harding, Sandra G., ed. 2004. The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader: Intellectual and Political Controversies. Routledge.
  28. Holmes, Georgina, Katharine A. M. Wright, Soumita Basu, Matthew Hurley, Maria Martin de Almagro, Roberta Guerrina, and Christine Cheng. 2019. “Feminist Experiences of ‘Studying Up’: Encounters with International Institutions.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 47 (2): 210–230.
  29. hooks, bell. 2014. Black Looks: Race and Representation. 2nd edition. Routledge.
  30. Kalina, Marc, and Dianne Scott. 2019. “You Have to Say Everything Is Nice Here: Complexities of Gatekeeping in Qualitative Research in Northern Mozambique.” Qualitative Research Journal 19 (3): 307–323.
  31. Kalinga, Chisomo. 2019. “Caught between a Rock and a Hard Place: Navigating Global Research Partnerships in the Global South as an Indigenous Researcher.” Journal of African Cultural Studies 31 (3): 270–272.
  32. Kessi, Shose, Zoe Marks, and Elelwani Ramugondo. 2020. “Decolonizing African Studies.” Critical African Studies 12 (3): 271–282.
  33. Lancaster, Kari. 2017. “Confidentiality, Anonymity and Power Relations in Elite Interviewing: Conducting Qualitative Policy Research in a Politicised Domain.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 20 (1): 93–103.
  34. Lugones, Maria. 2010. “Toward a Decolonial Feminism.” Hypatia 25 (4): 742–759.
  35. Marchais, Gauthier, Paulin Bazuzi, and Aimable Amani Lameke. 2020. “’The Data Is Gold, and We Are the Gold-Diggers’: Whiteness, Race and Contemporary Academic Research in Eastern DRC.” Critical African Studies 12 (3): 372–394.
  36. Marcus, Geroge E., and Michael M. J. Fischer. 1986. Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences. University of Chicago Press.
  37. Merry, Sally Engle. 2006. “Transnational Human Rights and Local Activism: Mapping the Middle.” American Anthropologist 108 (1): 38–51.
  38. Mignolo, Walter D. 2021. The Politics of Decolonial Investigations. Duke University Press.
  39. Mikecz, Robert. 2012. “Interviewing Elites: Addressing Methodological Issues.” Qualitative Inquiry 18 (6): 482–493.
  40. Miller, Tina, and Mary Boulton. 2007. “Changing Constructions of Informed Consent: Qualitative Research and Complex Social Worlds.” Social Science & Medicine 65 (11): 2199–2211.
  41. Mkhize, Nhlanhla. 2006. “Communal Personhood and the Principle of Authonomy: The Ethical Challenges.” Continuing Medical Education 24 (1): 26.
  42. Mosse, David, and Lena J. Kruckenberg. 2017. “Beyond the Ivory Tower: Researching Development Practice.” In Understanding Global Development Research: Fieldwork Issues, Experiences and Reflections, edited by D. Crawford, L. Kruckenberg, N. Loubere, and R. Morgan. SAGE Publications Limited.
  43. Mosse, David. 2011a. “Introduction: The Anthropology of Expertise and Professionals in International Development.” In Adventures in Aidland: The Anthropology of Professionals in International Development, edited by David Mosse , 1-31. Berghahn Books.
  44. Mosse, David. 2011b. “Politics and Ethics: Ethnographies of Expert Knowledge and Professional Identities.” In Policy Worlds: Anthropology and the Analysis of Contemporary Power, edited by Cris Shore, Susan Wright, and Davide Pero , 50-68. Berghahn Books.
  45. Msoroka, Mohamed S., and Diana Amundsen. 2017. “One Size Fits Not Quite All: Universal Research Ethics with Diversity.” Research Ethics 14 (3): 1–17.
  46. Nadarajah, Y., E. E. Burgos Martinez, P. Su, and A. Grydehøj. 2022. “Critical Reflexivity and Decolonial Methodology in Island Studies: Interrogating the Scholar Within.” Island Studies Journal 17 (1): 3–25.
  47. Nader, Laura. 1972. Up the Anthropologist: Perspectives Gained From Studying Up. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED065375.
  48. Nagar, Richa. 2014. “Dar Es Salaam: Making Peace with an Abandoned ‘Field’.” In Muddying the Waters: Coauthoring Feminisms across Scholarship and Activism, edited by Richa Nagar , 50-90. University of Illinois Press.
  49. Ntienjom Mbohou, Léger Félix, and Sule Tomkinson. 2022. “Rethinking Elite Interviews Through Moments of Discomfort: The Role of Information and Power.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 21: 1–10.
  50. Ortner, Sherry B. 2010. “Access: Reflections on Studying up in Hollywood.” Ethnography 11 (2): 211–233.
  51. Overton, John. 2013. “Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples.” Development in Practice 23 (4): 598–599.
  52. Peters, Rebecca Warne, and Claire Wendland. 2016. “Up the Africanist: The Possibilities and Problems of ‘Studying up’ in Africa”. Critical African Studies 8 (3): 239–254.
  53. Phillips, Louise, Maria Bee Christensen-Strynø, and Lisbeth Frølunde. 2022. “Thinking with Autoethnography in Collaborative Research: A Critical, Reflexive Approach to Relational Ethics.” Qualitative Research 22 (5): 761–776.
  54. Plankey-Videla, Nancy. 2012. “Informed Consent as Process: Problematizing Informed Consent in Organizational Ethnographies.” Qualitative Sociology 35 (1): 1–21.
  55. Quijano, Aníbal. 2007. “Coloniality and Modernity/Rationality.” Cultural Studies 21 (2–3): 168–178.
  56. Reinharz, Shulamit, and Susan E. Chase. 2001. “Interviewing Women.” In Handbook of Interview Research, edited by Shulamit Reinharz and Susan E. Chase, 220-238. SAGE Publications, Inc.
  57. Sabaratnam, Meera. 2011. “IR in Dialogue … but Can We Change the Subjects? A Typology of Decolonising Strategies for the Study of World Politics”. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 39 (3): 781–803.
  58. Schatz, Edward. 2009. Political Ethnography: What Immersion Contributes to the Study of Power. University of Chicago Press.
  59. Schoeman, Marelize I. 2019. “Research Ethics Governance? An African Perspective.” In Social Science Research Ethics in Africa, edited by Nico Nortjé, Retha Visagie, and J. S. Wessels . Springer Verlag, 1-15. Springer Verlag.
  60. Shilliam, Robbie. 2021. Decolonizing Politics: An Introduction. Polity.
  61. Silva, Cleia Maria da, Fernanda Filgueiras Sauerbronn, and Michel Thiollent. 2022. “Decolonial Studies, Non-Extractive Methods, and Participatory Action Research in Accounting.” Revista de Administração Contemporânea 26 (4): 1–17.
  62. Singh, Shenuka, and Douglas Wassenaar. 2016. “Contextualising the Role of the Gatekeeper in Social Science Research.” South African Journal of Bioethics and Law 9 (1): 42.
  63. Stepputat, Finn, and Jessica Larsen. 2015. Global Political Ethnography: A Methodological Approach to Studying Global Policy Regimes. DIIS Working Paper 2015: 1.
  64. Suárez-Krabbe, Julia. 2015. Race, Rights and Rebels: Alternatives to Human Rights and Development from the Global South. Rowman & Littlefield.
  65. Tickner, Arlene. 2003. “Seeing IR Differently: Notes from the Third World.” Millennium 32 (2): 295–324.
  66. Tieku, Thomas Kwasi. 2021. “Punching above Weight: How the African Union Commission Exercises Agency in Politics.” Africa Spectrum 56 (3): 254–273.
  67. Tilley, Elizabeth, and Marc Kalina. 2021. “‘My Flight Arrives at 5 Am, Can You Pick Me Up?’: The Gatekeeping Burden of the African Academic.” Journal of African Cultural Studies 33 (4): 538–548.
  68. Tuck, Eve, and Wayne K. Yang. 2014. “R-Words: Refusing Research.” In Humanizing Research: Decolonizing Qualitative Inquiry with Youth and Communities, edited by Django Paris and Maisha T. Winn , 223-248. SAGE Publications, Inc.
  69. Tucker, Karen. 2018. “Unraveling Coloniality in International Relations: Knowledge, Relationality, and Strategies for Engagement.” International Political Sociology 12 (3): 215–232.
  70. Vanner, Catherine. 2015. “Positionality at the Center: Constructing an Epistemological and Methodological Approach for a Western Feminist Doctoral Candidate Conducting Research in the Postcolonial.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 14 (4): 1–12.
  71. Visagie, Retha, Soné Beyers, and J. S. Wessels. 2019. “Informed Consent in Africa? Integrating Individual and Collective Autonomy.” In Social Science Research Ethics in Africa, edited by Nico Nortjé, Retha Visagie, and J. S. Wessels , 165-179. Springer Verlag.
  72. Vlavonou, Gino. 2021. “Skin Connections: Negotiating Institutional Ethics alongside Insider Identities.” In Field Research in Africa, edited by An Ansoms, Aymar Nyenyezi Bisoka, and Susan Thomson , 11-28. Boydell and Brewer Limited.
  73. Vlavonou, Gino. 2023. “Negotiating Positionality as a Student and Researcher in Africa: Understanding How Seniority and Race Mediate Elite Interviews in African Social Contexts.” International Studies Review 25 (1): viac064.
  74. Yacob-Haliso, Olajumoke. 2019. “Intersectionalities and Access in Fieldwork in Postconflict Liberia: Motherland, Motherhood, and Minefields.” African Affairs 118 (470): 168–181.
  75. Zähringer, Natalie, and Malte Brosig. 2020. “Organised Hypocrisy in the African Union: The Responsibility to Protect as a Contested Norm”. South African Journal of International Affairs 27 (1): 1–23.